Skip to main content

What Exit Interviews Can Do To Keep Your Staff

Many small business owners may not be aware of the hidden costs of employee turnover. While the causes of employee turnover may be unavoidable in certain small business (constraining salary budgets, lack of career track progression) many other factors may be in play.  The exit interview is not a forum for changing a departing employee's mind, but it may be the forum for finding out how you can prevent any future losses.

In November 2012, the Center for American Progress published a study in which they estimated that:
"• For workers earning less than $50,000 annually.... Business Costs to Replacing Employees = 20 percent of salary, the same as across positions earning $75,000 a year or less..."
• Among positions earning $30,000 or less... The typical cost of turnover ... is 16 percent of an employee’s annual salary"

So what should you ask, and who should do the asking?  Exit interviews can be done in-person or after the departure of an employee via computerized survey.  In my experience, the most useful knowledge is gleaned in person to person interviews and carried out either by Human Resources, or an independent third party. This is because many people may not want to open up as to the real factors behind their departure especially to someone they report to, or feel they may need a reference from in the future.  Especially if they are departing due to a negative experience with a particular person or direct supervisor, or because they have been asked to leave the company.

Ideally, the exit interview should be an opportunity for the employer to obtain useful information on how well they are doing in relation to business processes which affect employee morale, and to look for areas of opportunity for improvement such as:

  • Opportunities for advancement
  • Organizational culture
  • Compensation and benefits
  • Training and development opportunities
  • How well the recruitment and selection processes met the individual's expectations of the job they actually performed
  • The level and kind of direct supervision they received
  • What was enjoyable or frustrating about the organization, or their job
  • What ideas they have for improving their position or the organization
The exit interview should also be used as an opportunity to review any agreements that were signed upon hiring the employee, and to manage any paperwork or procedures  that may need to be completed prior to parting such as the return of company credit cards, business cards, computers or keys.

At Namaqua Consulting, we offer outsourced services which include the option for us to design and conduct Exit Interviews to meet your organizational needs, and provide recommendations based on the information we collate as to how improvements can be implemented to avoid further turnover and hence, further costs.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Passive Aggressive Behavior – Understanding and Managing it in the Workplace

In the Radical Collaboration world, we talk of three different kinds of working environments: While the Red and the Green Zone may be obvious in how they show up, the Pink Zone is equally powerful, and just as destructive as Red Zone thinking. Essentially, two words sum up the Pink Zone, “passive aggression”, but many hours and emotional frustrations result in its expression! Why does it show up, and how can you deal with it when it does? There are many reasons why people can become or act in a passive aggressive manner: They feel powerless or voiceless, and this is a way for them to have impact. They do not enjoy conflict and perceive deeper interactions with others as having the potential for conflict. The politics of the workplace may dictate that it is unsafe for them to speak out especially if it is against a superior or a well-liked colleague. The management style of the company is such that open communication is discouraged, or that bad behaviors are not managed. ...

From Conflict to Cooperation

In recent years, increasing numbers of clients are asking for help mediating disputes between individuals whose relationships are having a knock-on effect with their teams, the wider organization, and inevitably, their clients and customers. Most frequently, these conflicts result from a confusion of roles and responsibilities, thereby creating tension in decision making, agreeing the scope of responsibility, and taking accountability between individuals.  This confusion, coupled with tight deadlines, large work loads and functional and cross functional accountabilities, leads to chaos and frequently, poor leadership.  Yet it is in this state that individuals can choose to make successful or disastrous decisions, or be guided into previously unthought-of realms of possibilities and solutions.  It is here that the role of mediation or if possible, self-mediation (a core leadership skill) is a requirement. The cost of conflict in companies often goes unrecognized as...

Radical Collaboration

When overcoming issues of trust in a relationship, the greatest successes are seen when all parties go in with a positive intention to collaborate.  This includes the desire to remain open and truthful, and to take accountability for unintended consequences, as well as to work to resolve all issues, not only your own.  Being truly able to listen, understand, and problem solve together, along with a commitment to be transparent and to collaborate, will create a strong bond and an even stronger outcome for all parties.  The outcome will be that all parties will feel their needs have been both understood and met. Radical Collaboration is a great approach for teaching leaders how to achieve this collaborative approach. This blog article by  Horacio Falcão at Insead  talks to exactly these points.