Skip to main content

Why Radical Collaboration Gives Back

I recently read this HBR article by David Maxfield, on How a Culture of Silence Eats Away at Your Company.

No surprise, there were some shocking statistics in the article such as:'90% of nurses don’t speak up to a physician even when they know a patient’s safety is at risk. .... 93% of people say their organization is at risk of an accident waiting to happen because people are either unwilling or unable to speak up." or that the costs of these silences was so high 'The average person estimated the cost of silence at $7,500, and 20% of our sample estimated the cost of avoiding a difficult conversation to be more than $50,000. "

While these numbers are shocking, this syndrome is decades old.  I see this as a solid leadership problem.  As the article suggests, there are ways to overcome this problem.  However, the solutions are not instinctive, and really need to be learned and practiced.  Individuals and teams need to learn how to create an environment of trust where team players not only can feel safe to speak up, but also learn to manage and accept responsibility for their own behaviors.   But to do so, means that they have to be able to manage not only their own responses and behaviors, but learn how to be flexible and understanding of others.  There are always rational, political and emotional factors to be considered in any work interaction, and this is where the Radical Collaboration training is so powerful.

It not only gives people an understanding of how to approach different perspectives, but it goes through a clear process over a period of 3 days, in which people are taught the essential skills for building collaborative and how to lay the foundation to build more open relationships.  This approach has been tried and tested and is used by organizations like NASA, Boeng, ConMed Electrosurgery, Children's Hospital & Medical Center, Omaha, among many others.

The program is focused on collaborative skill building, with specific objectives to help participants:      

  •  Build collaborative skill
  • Gain understanding of the elements of building and maintaining long-term climates of trust
  • Develop skills establishing and solidifying partnerships and alliances
  • Learn about the dynamics of interpersonal relationships, particularly in conflicted situations
  • Practice problem solving in simulated and real-time situation
  • Gain personal insight into attitudes and behaviors in conflicted situations
After 20 years of trial and error, Jim Tamm and Ron Luyet, the founders of the Radical Collaboration approach, settled on 5 essential skills for collaboration:
  1. Collaborative intention - learning how to come from a positive and inclusive place
  2. Truthfulness - committing to both telling the truth and listening to the truth from others, no matter how uncomfortable
  3. Self-accountability - taking accountability for circumstances, choices, actions and the impact of our choices in our lives and relationships
  4. Self-awareness and awareness of others - committing to understanding more about yourself, and being open to exploring interpersonal issues, intentions and motivations.
  5. The ability to negotiate and problem solve - learning a range of approaches to include others in problem solving tools and approaches, which remove the element of competition and ensure that both parties feel their needs are being met.



Three studies have verified and shown remarkable results of the Radical Collaboration training adopted by companies:

The first study was conducted by the University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Industrial Relations.  It found:
  • The number of employees describing their working relationships as adversarial (as opposed to cooperative) was reduced by almost 70%.
  • 89% of participants reported increased effectiveness at managing conflict and resolving differences.
  • Prior to the training the majority of employees (57%) said their working relationships were unproductive.  
  • After the training, 87% of the employees said their working relationships were productive.
  • Almost all the participants felt the training had a highly positive impact on both the process and the products of their working relationships.

The second study analyzed information from very accurate data collected by the State of California regarding the amount of labor-management conflict within California’s 1,200 school districts.  The research documented an astonishing 85% reduction in the rate of disputes filed with the State among unions and employers that had participated in the training three years or more earlier.  The average reduction of measurable conflict in almost 100 organizations was close to 70%.

A third study focused on the impact of open enrollment workshops over a 6 year period with participants from 9 different countries. By focusing on learning the five key skills of the Radical Collaboration workshop participants reported, on average, the following gains:
  • ·         A 49.5% increase in effectiveness in reducing their own defensiveness in conflicted situations.
  • ·         A 44.8% increase in effectiveness at getting their interests met in conflicted situations.
  • ·         A 31.5% increase in effectiveness at problem solving.
  • ·         A 26.4% increase in effectiveness at building and maintaining climates of trust.


Two very recent studies with companies in Northern Europe also documented equally dramatic results.

If you would like to know more about how Radical Collaboration can help your company, contact Nicole Aliev, at www.namaquaconsulting.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Passive Aggressive Behavior – Understanding and Managing it in the Workplace

In the Radical Collaboration world, we talk of three different kinds of working environments: While the Red and the Green Zone may be obvious in how they show up, the Pink Zone is equally powerful, and just as destructive as Red Zone thinking. Essentially, two words sum up the Pink Zone, “passive aggression”, but many hours and emotional frustrations result in its expression! Why does it show up, and how can you deal with it when it does? There are many reasons why people can become or act in a passive aggressive manner: They feel powerless or voiceless, and this is a way for them to have impact. They do not enjoy conflict and perceive deeper interactions with others as having the potential for conflict. The politics of the workplace may dictate that it is unsafe for them to speak out especially if it is against a superior or a well-liked colleague. The management style of the company is such that open communication is discouraged, or that bad behaviors are not managed.

Why Red Zone Thinking Blocks Progress in Organizations and Politics

In yesterday's New York Times (July 26, 2017) there was a startling article by Kevin Quealy “Trump Is on Track to Insult 650 People, Places and Things on Twitter by the End of His First Term”.   For a leader to be in a place where he feels that he constantly has to attack, and is under attack, means that he is constantly under stress, and we all know that elevated cortisol and norepinephrine levels have a negative effect on bodily functions like the immune system, the metabolism as well as the mental health of the individual, such as memory and mental illness .  High levels of norepinephrine, means that the President is constantly in a state of fight or flight response.  It is no wonder then that there are so many reports of leaks, blame, hostility and silo’d thinking coming from the White House, let alone the competitive and short-term behaviors that are defining the Trump administration’s rule.  This is classic Red Zone behavior (in Radical Collaboration language). Over an

Workplace Harassment Training is Essential for Small and Large Businesses

The EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) is in the process of creating a new task force to prevent and address the issue of workplace harassment. The newly sworn in Commissioner of the EEOC commented that: "The EEOC is working to leverage our resources to have a greater impact on the persistent problem of workplace harassment," said Yang. "By identifying underlying problems in workplaces and industries where we see recurring patterns of harassment, we are developing strategies that focus on targeted outreach and education as well as systemic enforcement to promote broader voluntary compliance." Small business owners need to be aware that the EEOC will be looking with equal force at employers across industries, and they need to be sure that they take precautionary measures to educate themselves and their employees on the nature of harassment and discrimination. Many employers may not be aware that they are responsible, and their supervisors are