Skip to main content

Why Red Zone Thinking Blocks Progress in Organizations and Politics


In yesterday's New York Times (July 26, 2017) there was a startling article by Kevin Quealy “Trump Is on Track to Insult 650 People, Places and Things on Twitter by the End of His First Term”.  For a leader to be in a place where he feels that he constantly has to attack, and is under attack, means that he is constantly under stress, and we all know that elevated cortisol and norepinephrine levels have a negative effect on bodily functions like the immune system, the metabolism as well as the mental health of the individual, such as memory and mental illness.  High levels of norepinephrine, means that the President is constantly in a state of fight or flight response. 

It is no wonder then that there are so many reports of leaks, blame, hostility and silo’d thinking coming from the White House, let alone the competitive and short-term behaviors that are defining the Trump administration’s rule.  This is classic Red Zone behavior (in Radical Collaboration language). Over and over leaders and businesses who operate in this manner have damaged their companies.  Negative corporate cultures invariably allow bad behavior and poor discipline to cloud ethical decisions and to encourage an unhealthy level of competition, where trust, teamwork and collaboration are destroyed.  The result is that time, resources and productivity are compromised.  And over time, employees, clients, and suppliers are alienated.

This reminds me of an HBR article from the July-August 1999 issue, “Why Good Companies Go Bad”, by Donald Sull.  In the article, Sull puts forward the premise that an active inerita in the face of failure, sets into the leadership mindset, and all the leadership team beome capable of doing is to ‘follow established patterns of behavior…Stuck in the modes of thinking and working that brought success in the past”.  For the Republican Party, what worked in the past was to make or repeat loud and often untrue accusations (eg. The Birther Movement), refuse compromise, step away from collaboration, and to roundly condemn any progress or policy put forward by the Democrats.   This brought great success to the Republican Party who nervously celebrated their Presidential win (I say nervously, as there were many bruised egos, battered reputations and tight-lipped smiles in the Party at the time). But it was these very behaviors, that I believe are bringing them down, and placing them in this state of active inertia, and where they are ignoring that it is now time to change strategy.

For an organization to move from Red Zone to Green Zone thinking and behavior, requires a change in leadership behavior.  Without this, there is a tacit allowance for bad behaviors to continue.  Thus the first step is to admit that a  new focus and approach is required, admitting that what worked in the past is stale and not working. The second step, is to start taking responsibility for what is not working, and to be brave enough to go first, to set the tone in reaching out to make change happen, but - and this is crucial - from a genuine place of intent.  To bring that back to politics in the US, this is exactly what the public is now demanding of their leaders, both Democratic and Republican.  If our leadership can hear this, the desire to start with a change, will start with the need to change the tone of leadership, and for our leadership to show a true desire to start working collaboratively.  In the Radical Collaboration community, we call this "Having Collaborative Intent."

But having a Collaborative Intent is only the start of a long journey in which effort, thought and self-reflection have to play a role before success and change can be realized.  This journey would require our leadership to go through several steps, such as:

  • Requiring a new level of truthfulness, where they are truly open to listening, empathizing and attempting to understand, before taking a position.  
  • Taking accountability for the intended and unintended consequences of what has been said, and the actions that have been taken. 
  • Developing greater self-awareness of each other's concerns, intentions and motivations, and learning how to behave in a less defensive and needy manner, and be more flexible to different priorities and interactions.  
  • Learning how to come at problems from an Interest-Based perspective, with representatives who can truly facilitate alternative problem solving and solution seeking.  

But first, it all has to START with a STOP .  Stop the insults, stop the blame, stop the aggression. Recognize it is no longer working.  START with a genuine intent to create something positive and new, reach out, and see what happens.

 Find out more about Radical Collaboration Training for Organizations and how we can help you change the culture in your organization on our website.  at https://www.namaquaconsulting.com/events/
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Workplace Harassment Training is Essential for Small and Large Businesses

The EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) is in the process of creating a new task force to prevent and address the issue of workplace harassment. The newly sworn in Commissioner of the EEOC commented that: "The EEOC is working to leverage our resources to have a greater impact on the persistent problem of workplace harassment," said Yang. "By identifying underlying problems in workplaces and industries where we see recurring patterns of harassment, we are developing strategies that focus on targeted outreach and education as well as systemic enforcement to promote broader voluntary compliance." Small business owners need to be aware that the EEOC will be looking with equal force at employers across industries, and they need to be sure that they take precautionary measures to educate themselves and their employees on the nature of harassment and discrimination. Many employers may not be aware that they are responsible, and their supervisors are
1 comment
Read more

Passive Aggressive Behavior – Understanding and Managing it in the Workplace

In the Radical Collaboration world, we talk of three different kinds of working environments: While the Red and the Green Zone may be obvious in how they show up, the Pink Zone is equally powerful, and just as destructive as Red Zone thinking. Essentially, two words sum up the Pink Zone, “passive aggression”, but many hours and emotional frustrations result in its expression! Why does it show up, and how can you deal with it when it does? There are many reasons why people can become or act in a passive aggressive manner: They feel powerless or voiceless, and this is a way for them to have impact. They do not enjoy conflict and perceive deeper interactions with others as having the potential for conflict. The politics of the workplace may dictate that it is unsafe for them to speak out especially if it is against a superior or a well-liked colleague. The management style of the company is such that open communication is discouraged, or that bad behaviors are not managed.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Space For - And Power of - Apology

Recently, I found myself in a situation where I become the unwitting focus of a poison email copied to eight other people.  I was stunned.  My immediate reaction was a knee-jerk response, wanting to send a smarting reply that would put him down, and show how I was the unwitting victim of his surprise attack. Instead, I chose a different route, and decided to slow down.  My Radical Collaboration training has taught me that taking a breath and stepping back from something when I notice a physical or emotional reaction, gives me the ability to try to understand my own “need” behind my reaction.  In this situation, my need was to be seen as competent and in control by others.  As a result, I had to own that it was MY interpretation of his email which fed MY own feelings of incompetence, and I had to manage that, not him.  He did not intend my reaction. By understanding that about myself, it allowed me to divorce my reality from an attempt to interpret his intention.  But it was also
Post a Comment
Read more